Innovation & Tech

81% of Job Seekers Say Companies Never Responded to Their Applications

A Greenhouse survey finds 81% of job seekers were ghosted at least once this year, as AI screening pushes applicants to fire back with AI-optimized resumes.

By Amara Osei

3 min read

At this point, 80% of job seekers apply and hear nothing
At this point, 80% of job seekers apply and hear nothingGoumbik / pixabay

What's News

  • 81% of job seekers said a company never responded to them at least once in the past year, per Greenhouse.
  • 45% of respondents who interviewed with a company were then completely ghosted.
  • 54% of job hunters use AI to decode employer screening systems; 40% add inaccurate skills or keywords.
  • Gen Z applicants report the highest ghosting rate, with 38% saying it happens often or almost always.

Eighty-one percent of job seekers say a company never got back to them — human or machine — at least once in the past year. That figure comes from a new survey by hiring platform Greenhouse, and it captures a labor market where silence has become the default employer response.

The numbers get worse from there. Nearly a third of respondents (31%) said this ghosting happens "often or almost always." Among Gen Z applicants, the rate climbs to 38%. Even candidates who made it to the interview stage aren't safe: 45% told Greenhouse they interviewed with an organization and then heard nothing at all.

Why can't employers and candidates find each other?

The irony is sharp. Employers themselves report growing difficulty finding qualified candidates, said Greenhouse Chief People Officer Sharawn Tipton.

"For the first time I can remember, neither side thinks hiring is working," she said. "Candidates send applications into a black hole, while employers sift through AI-polished resumes that all look the same."

Greenhouse calls the mechanism behind this the "AI doom loop." Employers lean on AI screening systems, which pushes applicants to flood the market with AI-optimized applications. Buried under a mountain of near-identical submissions, employers run out of time to send formal rejections. The loop feeds itself.

The survey data backs that diagnosis. More than half of job hunters (54%) said they use AI to figure out what a specific employer's screening system wants. Forty percent admitted adding skills and keywords that don't accurately describe them. Another third said they embedded hidden text in applications to catch the attention of an AI reviewer.

What would fix the screening process?

Ophir Samson, Greenhouse's Head of Voice AI, said automation has created a measurement gap. As recruiting becomes increasingly automated, companies need better ways to assess candidates' subjective qualities, and candidates need better ways to demonstrate their ability to learn and adapt.

"AI can polish a resume or fire off hundreds of applications, but it can't show an employer how someone thinks or learns," Samson said. His proposed fix: move an interview — even an automated one — to the very start of the application process.

"A structured conversation early in the process could give the right candidates that chance," Samson said. "But it only works if candidates understand how they're being evaluated, and know a real person will review their responses."

What should applicants do right now?

For the people sending applications into the void, the answer may be less about technology and more about connections. Melissa Loble, chief learning officer at education technology firm Instructure, told Fast Company that a referral network matters more than ever.

"Social capital is a key part of getting noticed [because it helps you] stand out when there are thousands of applications and it's all AI talking to AI," Loble said.

She also recommends building a work portfolio and tailoring it hard to the specific role. "Lead with a portfolio of capabilities and examples of work," she said. "Be very concrete: This example of work fits these skills, and these skills map to the kinds of jobs I want."

What does this mean for hiring in 2025?

The combination of rampant ghosting and a rising number of ghost jobs — postings that companies never intend to fill — has made job hunting more hostile than at any recent point. Radio silence from employers compounds the problem, leaving candidates unable to tell whether they were rejected, filtered out by software, or chasing a listing that was never real.

Until employers restructure how they screen AI-generated applications, the doom loop keeps spinning: more automated applications, more algorithmic filtering, and fewer responses on either side. Samson's early-interview model and Loble's referral-and-portfolio playbook are two concrete exits — but both require one side to move first in a market where, as Tipton put it, neither side thinks hiring is working.

Source: Fast Company

Share this article:

More from Amara Osei

Amara Osei

Show full bio

Senior reporter covering companies, deals and strategy in entrepreneurship, startups and venture funding at Business Bearings.

1,259 articles

Related articles

« Previous articleNext article »