Anthropic's Amodei Becomes the Face of AI Doomerism
A White House memo, an SNL parody and a dinner with Trump: Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei is now the public face of AI doomerism, squeezed by critics on both sides.
By Daniel Okafor
4 min read
Updated

What's News
- Former Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon resigned on September 8 and claimed on X that 'the people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade,' drawing 174.2 million views.
- A White House memo circulated by Axios on September 24 names Amodei as a driver of 'effective altruism' and blames it for the 'AI doom pipeline'; Trump previously blacklisted Anthropic and called its leaders 'Leftwing nut jobs.'
- Amodei's September 12 essay 'We Must Pace the Frontier' proposes third-party oversight of frontier AI development, safety-standard collaborations among democratic countries, and pressure on authoritarian governments.
In the span of four days, Dario Amodei was named in a White House opposition-research memo, parodied on "Saturday Night Live," and seated at dinner with the president of the United States.
The 43-year-old CEO of Anthropic has spent weeks calling for tighter regulation and a slower pace of AI development—while running one of the largest AI developers in the world. That contradiction has now made him the most recognizable figure in the current wave of AI doomerism, according to Fast Company's account of the episode.
The frenzy began on September 8, when former Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon resigned and posted a lengthy statement on X that has drawn 174.2 million views and counting. "The people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade," Coxon wrote.
Other high-profile Anthropic employees echoed the warning. Evan Hubinger, an alignment science lead at the company, wrote on X: "We really do earnestly believe AI could kill all humans! I personally think it is >10% within the next decade. I believe Anthropic is trying its best, but we do not yet have a plan to solve alignment for superintelligence and are not clearly on track to." Samuel Marks, another Anthropic employee, replied to Coxon with his own fears about "extinction-level bad outcomes."
Amodei's prescription
On September 12, Amodei entered the debate with a blog post titled "We Must Pace the Frontier." He opened by arguing AI could "dramatically raise the quality of human life," comparing its potential to a "miracle" if wielded correctly. But he also flagged risks including "losing control of AI systems, misuse of AI for cyberattacks and bioterrorism, and serious economic disruption."
His proposed plan calls for third-party experts to gain access to frontier AI companies' development processes, collaborations among AI firms in democratic countries to set safety standards, and efforts to impose those standards on authoritarian governments.
"I continue to believe that AI can enormously improve the quality of human life," the post's final paragraph reads. "My desire to achieve these benefits is undimmed. But the benefits will only be achieved if we build the technology in the right way, and—so long as we use the time we gain well—it is worth taking unusually deliberate care to get it right."
Since publishing the post, Amodei has repeated his calls for government and public involvement in AI development in multiple interviews.
A target in Washington
The political response has been hostile. Earlier this year, Anthropic clashed with Pentagon officials over the company's efforts to limit how the military could use Claude, its flagship model. President Donald Trump blacklisted the firm over the dispute and labeled its leaders "Leftwing nut jobs," according to The Washington Post. Trump and his supporters have also rejected the recent calls for an AI slowdown, citing Chinese competition.
On September 24, Axios circulated a White House memo drafted to push back on Amodei's safety warnings ahead of the midterm elections. The memo names Amodei directly as one of the people responsible for the rise of "effective altruism," which it blames for the current "AI doom pipeline." Amodei has previously told Vanity Fair that he does not subscribe to the effective altruism philosophy.
Two days later, on September 26, SNL cast member Jane Wickline played Amodei at the "Weekend Update" desk in a sketch built around his internal conflict. In a Gollum-versus-Sméagol-style exchange, Wickline's Amodei wrestled with himself while delivering his most alarming assessments. "AI is the devil, and I its maker," he let slip a minute into the bit.
At another point, the bespectacled character told audiences, "if we can pressure lawmakers to create guardrails, we will be able to stop me," before struggling to answer host Michael Che's question about whether Anthropic plans to "kill us all." The sketch closed with the line: "AI is not a weapon. It's a tool—a tool for building weapons. And I urge you to urge me to stop."
By Sunday night, September 28, Amodei was dining with Trump, according to The Washington Post—a meeting between the president who blacklisted his company and the CEO whose slowdown proposals he has publicly opposed.
Squeezed from both sides
The sketch landed because Amodei now occupies an awkward position: a lightning rod for AI optimists and a symbol of hypocrisy for AI skeptics. Boosters treat him as a political punching bag. Naysayers see him as the archetypal AI CEO—calling for a slower pace of innovation while actively setting that pace.
The discourse has spread beyond Anthropic's walls. Sen. Bernie Sanders, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, and Amodei have all expressed support for greater AI regulation in recent weeks, according to Fast Company.
With the midterm elections approaching and the White House already circulating opposition research on the AI safety camp, Amodei's calls for pacing the frontier will be fought as much in political campaigns as in policy debates.
Original: axios.com
More from Daniel Okafor
Show full bio
Correspondent covering business strategy at Business Bearings.
287 articles