ByteDance’s Doubao Takes a 12% Cut of Hotel Bookings
ByteDance earns 12% on some Doubao hotel bookings, up from 8% on Douyin. October holiday orders rose more than 56%, but price gaps and ranking concerns threaten travel platforms.
By Amara Osei
4 min read

What's News
- ByteDance charges participating hotels roughly 12% on certain Doubao bookings, up from 8% on ordinary Douyin orders.
- Doubao hotel orders rose more than 56% year over year during China’s October holiday.
- On a 500-yuan room, the commission rises from 40 yuan at 8% to 60 yuan at 12%.
- Trip.com Group recorded 6.6 billion yuan in second-quarter accommodation-booking revenue, up 6%.
- Meituan reported that Xiao Tuan searches rose 29% during the October holiday.
By Amara Osei
ByteDance now charges participating hotels roughly 12% on certain bookings completed through Doubao, its AI assistant, up from 8% on ordinary Douyin orders. During China’s October holiday, hotel orders through Doubao rose more than 56% from a year earlier, according to Douyin’s local-services unit.
ByteDance is the privately held company behind TikTok. Douyin’s local-services unit disclosed no absolute booking count. That leaves the size of Doubao’s gains over established travel websites unresolved, even as ByteDance tests a more direct path from conversation to reservation.
How does Doubao turn a conversation into a booking?
Tang Hong was planning a late-summer trip to Qingdao with her parents. She wanted a quiet hotel close enough to the sea for a stroll, with good taxi access, costing around 400 yuan ($56) a night. Instead of comparing listings, reading reviews and checking maps, she told Doubao her requirements and said she liked the results.
ByteDance earns a transaction fee when a participating hotel completes a booking through Doubao. On a 500-yuan room, 12% produces 60 yuan, compared with 40 yuan at the previous 8% rate. A Shandong hotel manager told Dazhong News that conventional online travel agencies charged his property 11% to 13%, placing Doubao within the range this property already faced.
The distinction is the interface. Doubao looks less like a booking website than a conversational adviser, while hotels pay for completed orders rather than chatbot praise.
How large is the holiday booking surge?
Qu Chuang, a digital-economy researcher at Shandong University, described the shift in AI economics: “We used to judge AI by active users and time spent. Now it’s about how many people spend money through it.” His point captures the pressure on AI platforms to move beyond attention metrics and into commerce.
One guesthouse operator in Chongqing told Chongqing Daily he could accept the 12% fee if Doubao brought customers he would not otherwise get. He was not interested if the chatbot merely redirected travelers who would have booked through Douyin.
Are Doubao’s room prices competitive?
In August, reporters at China’s National Business Daily compared rooms offered through Doubao with listings on Douyin and Trip.com. In their sample, Doubao was frequently more expensive, sometimes by as much as 80 yuan, or roughly $11.
A separate check by financial-news outlet Yicai found a luxury suite at Beijing’s Peninsula Hotel listed for 2,915 yuan through Doubao, versus 2,624 yuan on Trip.com and 2,332 yuan quoted directly by the hotel. Other Chinese reporters found cases where Doubao offered the lower rate. Discounts and booking terms complicated those comparisons, and the tests did not establish that ByteDance’s commission caused any price gap; travelers should compare rates elsewhere before booking.
Can hotels buy better rankings?
ByteDance has said merchants cannot buy their way into better recommendations. Liu Xing, a Doubao public-relations executive, said publicly that hotels pay a channel fee only when an order completes, not for advertisements or preferential rankings.
Zhang Yi, chief analyst at Chinese research firm iiMedia, nevertheless warned: “revenue sharing itself creates a risk of [customer] steering.” The unresolved issue is which interests shape a recommendation when ByteDance can earn from the resulting sale.
Who faces the disruption?
Trip.com Group, the Singapore-based company, collected 6.6 billion yuan, about $969 million, in accommodation-booking revenue in the second quarter, up 6% from a year earlier. It also operates its own AI, alongside hotel relationships and customer-service and booking infrastructure built over years.
Rival Meituan reported that searches through its Xiao Tuan AI assistant rose 29% during the October holiday from the same period a year earlier. Alibaba has connected its Qwen chatbot to services including travel bookings and food delivery.
For investors in Trip.com, Meituan, Booking Holdings and Expedia, the question is whether consumers will keep opening booking apps at all. The company collecting those conversations may eventually control which hotels and which booking platforms travelers consider.
Can agents replace booking platforms?
Discovery is the easy part. Cancellations, missed check-ins and arguments over what the hotel promised are harder. Established booking platforms have spent years learning how to deal with those issues.
An AI assistant hears travelers describe their budgets, preferences and plans in their own words. The company collecting those conversations may eventually influence which hotels and booking platforms appear in recommendations.
The next test is whether Doubao’s 56% October holiday surge becomes repeat booking volume while matching established platforms on prices and service. If it does, ByteDance’s 12% fee could give it influence over both hotel demand and booking distribution.
Source: MarketWatch
More from Amara Osei
Show full bio
Senior reporter covering companies, deals and strategy in entrepreneurship, startups and venture funding at Business Bearings.
1,223 articles