Innovation & Tech

One in Five UK Buyers Say They Were 'Housefished' by AI Listings

One in five recent UK homebuyers viewed AI-enhanced listings that flattered reality. Trading Standards says structural edits could break the law.

By Nathan Brooks

3 min read

The rise of 'housefishing' - when does using AI go from enhancing to misleading?
The rise of 'housefishing' - when does using AI go from enhancing to misleading?Alexas_Fotos / pixabay

What's News

  • One in five UK homebuyers who bought in the past year reported viewing a property with digitally enhanced photos, per a survey of 906 buyers.
  • Trading Standards says AI edits like adding windows or hiding features could break the law; basic enhancement is allowed if labelled.
  • Jack Bushrod of Housing Horrors reports a 'surge' of AI-enhanced listing images over the last six months.
  • Rightmove, Zoopla and Winkworth removed AI-enhanced images after buyer Olivia Nicole, 29, complained her London viewing mismatched the photos.
  • Estate agent Howards now labels all AI-enhanced photos on its listings.

One in five UK homebuyers who purchased in the past year say they viewed a property whose listing photos had been digitally enhanced to look better than reality, according to a recent survey of 906 buyers. The practice has a name now — "housefishing" — and it sits in an uncomfortable grey zone between marketing and misrepresentation.

The economics are simple. Estate agents have always flattered homes with wide-angle lenses and Photoshop. AI has collapsed the cost and skill barrier to the point where any listing can be reimagined in minutes. That accessibility is exactly what worries the people tracking the trend.

What does it look like in practice?

Olivia Nicole, 29, was searching for five-bedroom properties in south-west London earlier this year when a house on Rightmove caught her eye. When she arrived for the viewing, she initially thought she'd come to the wrong address.

"The rooms were much smaller than they were in the pictures and the decor was totally different," she told the BBC. "Some structural features were also different."

A raised section of wall behind the sofa didn't appear in the images. The windows were noticeably smaller. The photos she'd seen — which also ran on Zoopla and Winkworth — turned out to be AI-enhanced, and the listing didn't say so. She took her own comparison pictures and says the agent wasted her time: she'd taken several hours off work for the viewing and had to make them up. All three companies told the BBC they have strict guidelines on AI use and have since removed the images.

Jack Bushrod reviews odd listings from Rightmove on his social media channel, Housing Horrors. He says he's seen a "surge" of AI-enhanced images over the last six months, and most weren't clearly labelled.

His tolerance has limits. Decluttering a busy room or furnishing an empty one so buyers can see potential? Fine. Structural fantasy? Not fine.

"I've seen one house where they had removed a pillar and added a window. Others might use AI to remove stains on the carpet or cracks in tiles. It's little details you would only notice in person."

What does this change for sellers and agents?

For sellers, the risk cuts both ways. Cara, 38, is selling her home in Lowestoft, Suffolk, and was surprised when her agent, Howards, posted AI-enhanced pictures on Rightmove: one image emptied her son's room of toys entirely; another removed a doll's house, brightened the room and reshaped a rug (that one has since been taken down).

She's had several viewings, and one viewer commented on the differences. But she trusts the agent, which acknowledged the AI use in the listing. "If they'd changed something structurally or it was really wild and didn't look like our home at all then I would put my foot down," she said.

A Howards spokeswoman said the firm now labels all AI-enhanced photos and never uses AI "to misrepresent the fundamental features of a property". Her framing is the industry's likely defence: "It's about helping people imagine the possibilities, not changing the reality of what's being sold."

Where's the legal line?

Trading Standards told the BBC that basic enhancements, virtual furnishing of an empty room or garden are acceptable — as long as the agent indicates the technology was used. Structurally changing a room, say by adding a window, or hiding features could mislead consumers and break the law.

The Guild of Property Professionals, a trade group of independent agents, says the practice is hard to quantify but has already issued guidance on responsible AI enhancement.

Bushrod wants mandatory, prominent labelling — flagged on the key-features slide of every listing, not buried. And he expects the problem to grow: "My worry is the more estate agents use AI, others will see the trend and jump on the bandwagon."

For buyers, the practical takeaway is blunt: treat listing photos as concept art until you've stood in the room. For agents, the cheap edit is becoming a liability question — and labelling, voluntarily or not, is where this market is heading.

Original: housebuyerbureau.co.uk

Share this article:

More from Nathan Brooks

Nathan Brooks

Show full bio

News editor covering regulation, policy and their impact on entrepreneurship, startups and venture funding at Business Bearings.

2,029 articles

Related articles

« Previous articleNext article »