Money & Markets

Oracle Shares Slide on Report of Project Jupiter Data-Center Delay Risk

Oracle fell 3.11% premarket after Bloomberg reported the company is invoking force majeure to limit payments if its New Mexico Project Jupiter data center misses its 2028 capacity target.

By Olivia Hart

3 min read

Updated

Oracle’s stock is falling as investors fear a data-center setback
Oracle’s stock is falling as investors fear a data-center setbackAI-generated

What's News

  • Oracle shares fell 3.11% in premarket trading on Thursday, Sept. 24, 2026.
  • Bloomberg News reported Oracle is citing force majeure to shield itself from payments tied to Project Jupiter, a New Mexico data center.
  • The company is seeking protection in case the project fails to bring capacity online in 2028 as expected, according to anonymous sources cited by Bloomberg.

Oracle shares fell 3.11% in premarket trading on Thursday after a Bloomberg News report said the company is moving to shield itself from heavy costs tied to a data-center project in New Mexico known as Project Jupiter.

The report, published Thursday morning and citing anonymous sources, said Oracle is taking steps to insulate itself from having to make payments if the project fails to bring capacity online in 2028 as expected. According to Bloomberg, Oracle has cited force majeure — a contract clause typically invoked when extraordinary events outside a party's control prevent it from meeting obligations — to protect itself on the controversial data center.

The stock's decline signals that investors read the report as more than routine legal housekeeping. A company invoking force majeure on a flagship infrastructure build is, at minimum, an acknowledgment that the timeline for the facility is in doubt. At stake is the 2028 target for bringing capacity online, the milestone against which Oracle's payment obligations appear to be measured.

Project Jupiter is the name given to the New Mexico data center at the center of Thursday's sell-off. Bloomberg characterized the project as controversial, and the report's framing — Oracle seeking protection from expenses if delays materialize — suggests the company itself sees a meaningful probability that the 2028 deadline will slip.

The mechanics matter for Oracle's cost base. If the project cannot deliver capacity on schedule, Oracle faces potential payments it is now trying to avoid. The Bloomberg report, relying on anonymous sources, did not specify the size of the exposure. But the market reaction — a drop of more than 3% before the opening bell — indicates investors are pricing in the possibility that the delay scenario carries real financial weight.

MarketWatch, which reported on the Bloomberg story on Thursday, noted that the report flagged challenges related to the New Mexico project and that Oracle shares were set to fall on the day.

For a company that has staked much of its recent narrative on building out computing capacity at scale, the episode cuts at a sensitive point. Data-center construction timelines are the foundation on which cloud and infrastructure revenue commitments rest. When a company begins erecting contractual barriers against the cost of a missed deadline, it tells the market that execution risk has moved from abstract to concrete.

It also raises a forward-looking question that Thursday's trading only begins to answer. If Project Jupiter slips past 2028, the force-majeure positioning reported by Bloomberg may limit Oracle's direct payments — but investors will now be watching the company's next disclosures for any sign of whether capacity commitments tied to the facility, and the revenue expectations built on them, need to be recalibrated as well.

Oracle had not, according to the reports, publicly detailed the extent of the project's challenges beyond what anonymous sources described. The 2028 capacity target remains the benchmark. Whether Oracle can hit it, and at what cost, is now the question hanging over the stock.

Original: wsj.com

Share this article:

More from Olivia Hart

Olivia Hart

Show full bio

Staff writer covering industry trends and analytics at Business Bearings.

228 articles

Related articles

« Previous articleNext article »