Money & Markets

Stock Market Wins the Midterms Either Way, Morgan Stanley's Wilson Says

Morgan Stanley's Mike Wilson says midterms are a 'clearing event': stocks have gained roughly 22% in the year after midterms since 1982, whichever party wins. Kalshi puts a Democratic sweep at 71%.

By Grace Kim

3 min read

The election will be good news, regardless of outcome, says Morgan Stanley’s chief stock-market strategist
The election will be good news, regardless of outcome, says Morgan Stanley’s chief stock-market strategistMerakist / unsplash

What's News

  • Since 1982, large-cap stocks gained ~22% in the year after midterms, per Mike Wilson.
  • Kalshi on Monday priced a 71% chance of a Democratic sweep, 24% chance Republicans hold the Senate.
  • 10-year Treasury yields fell nearly 40bp since end-September; 62% of S&P 500 stocks now above their 200-day average.
  • Equal-weighted S&P 500 gained nearly 5% since late September, beating the cap-weighted index by almost 6%.
  • Wilson flags Iran escalation and additional post-election tariffs as the bigger risks.

Large-cap stocks have gained about 22% in the year following every U.S. midterm since 1982, and Morgan Stanley's chief stock-market strategist Mike Wilson says this election won't break the pattern — no matter who wins.

Wilson told clients the midterms are a classic "clearing event" whose outcome at this point doesn't really matter. The historical numbers back him up: since 1982, large-capitalization stocks have gained approximately 15% on a cap-weighted basis and 16% on an equal-weighted basis in the six months following midterms. Both measures have risen roughly 22% over the subsequent year.

The takeaway: the market's reaction, not the ballot result, is the trade.

What does a Democratic sweep change?

The prediction market Kalshi on Monday was pricing a 71% chance of a Democratic sweep and a 24% chance Republicans keep control of the U.S. Senate.

"A Democrat sweep via a narrow Senate majority is anticipated by investors and therefore unlikely to be a major market surprise, while a much more decisive Senate victory would potentially push the equity market to look further out to 2028 in terms of pushback against deregulation," Wilson said in a note to clients.

He added a caveat: "many of the policies that have moved markets most over the last two years, including tariffs, foreign policy and agency-led deregulation, remain largely under executive branch's control, and equities typically don't think two years ahead very often or for very long."

In plain words: even a Democratic Congress can't rewrite the tariff agenda on its own.

Wilson even flagged upside from a Democratic majority. Possible efforts to delay or reverse Medicaid and food-stamp cuts could support consumption. A second potential bonus: companies pulling forward investment and M&A activity to beat a shift in policy in 2028.

Where does the correction stand?

The correction that began in June is now in the final innings, Wilson said, with the S&P 500 retreating as breadth improves.

The internals tell the story. Since the end of September, 10-year Treasury yields have declined by nearly 40 basis points. The percentage of S&P 500 stocks trading above their 200-day moving average has risen about 20 percentage points to 62%. Over the same stretch, the equal-weighted S&P 500 has gained nearly 5%, outperforming the cap-weighted index by almost 6%.

"This supports our view heading into October that back-end yields were likely approaching a peak, and that the equal weight S&P was the more attractive expression of the broadening trade," Wilson said.

Breadth is widening even as the headline index slips — historically a late-stage correction signal.

One caveat on small caps: the "lower quality" Russell 2000 likely needs a bigger decline in rates than what has already occurred, Wilson said.

What are the real risks?

Wilson doesn't see a clear path to zero risk. He identified the more significant dangers as renewed military escalation with Iran or additional tariffs after the election — both outside the ballot box entirely.

That framing matters for positioning. Investors pricing the midterm outcome are watching the wrong variable; the ones that move markets — executive-branch policy and geopolitics — don't appear on any ballot.

Source: MarketWatch

Share this article:

More from Grace Kim

Grace Kim

Show full bio

Market editor covering people, launches and day-to-day practice in entrepreneurship, startups and venture funding at Business Bearings.

1,432 articles

Related articles

« Previous articleNext article »