US Intelligence Memo Says Megaspeed Exec Was Recruited to Spy on Nvidia CEO
A U.S. intelligence memo claims China recruited a Megaspeed executive to spy on Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang; Nvidia calls the interactions "not unusual" and denies sharing classified data.
By Olivia Hart
3 min read
What's News
- A U.S. intelligence-based memo circulated earlier this year claims China's Ministry of State Security recruited Alice Huang to spy on Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang.
- The Financial Times reported the memo also claimed a romantic relationship between Jensen Huang and Alice Huang, an executive at Singapore-based Megaspeed.
- Nvidia said interactions were "not unusual" and that it does not share classified information with customers.
- A NYT report found New Matrix, a Chinese firm authorized by the U.S. Commerce Department to buy advanced Nvidia chips, listed an office that was a "hollow gray shell."
A U.S. intelligence-based memo circulated earlier this year claims China's Ministry of State Security recruited technology executive Alice Huang to spy on Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, according to multiple media reports. The New York Times, which had previously reported that the Nvidia chief executive was a target of Chinese intelligence, first reported the memo's existence. The Financial Times followed with an additional detail: the memo also claimed Jensen Huang had a romantic relationship with Alice Huang, an executive at Singapore-based Megaspeed.
The claim lands at a moment when Nvidia sits at the center of U.S.-China technology controls. What the memo does not do, at least in the public record, is establish whether any intelligence operation actually succeeded. Neither paper has published the underlying intelligence assessment itself; both rely on descriptions of the memo.
What has Nvidia said?
An Nvidia spokesperson told the NYT that Jensen Huang's interactions with Alice Huang were "not unusual." The spokesperson added that the company does not share classified information with its customers.
That is a carefully bounded denial. It addresses the framing of the interactions, not the substance of the recruitment claim, and it rests on the premise that customers — however connected — cannot obtain classified material from Nvidia in the first place.
The spokesperson also addressed the broader question of where Nvidia's technology goes, saying the company sells "the first, best and most of our technology in America." That statement reads as a defense of Nvidia's U.S. footing amid scrutiny of its foreign customer base.
What is the New Matrix connection?
A separate NYT report examined a Chinese company called New Matrix, which holds U.S. Commerce Department authorization to buy advanced Nvidia chips. Reporters visited the office address New Matrix had listed and found what they described as "a hollow gray shell."
That finding raises the possibility that New Matrix operates as a front, potentially for a blacklisted private equity firm. If accurate, the episode would point to a gap between the paperwork of export controls and the physical reality they are meant to govern. The report stops short of proving the front-company allegation; it documents an address with no evident operations.
For Nvidia, the stakes are straightforward. Advanced chips subject to U.S. export rules are the company's core product, and any channel that diverts them to restricted parties carries regulatory and reputational risk. An empty office as the listed footprint of an authorized buyer invites the question of who is actually receiving the hardware.
Why the memo matters now
The reported recruitment claim touches Nvidia's most important asset: Jensen Huang himself, who has led the company since its founding and anchored its rise to the top tier of global chipmakers. Intelligence interest in a CEO of that profile is not unprecedented, but a named target and a named recruit in a circulating memo is unusual granularity for a public report.
The relationship claim adds a second layer. If the Financial Times' description of the memo is accurate, the alleged recruitment effort operated through a personal connection rather than a corporate channel — the kind of access that standard supplier and customer vetting would not necessarily catch. That is precisely the gap Nvidia's statement about classified information does not address.
Neither report establishes what, if anything, was passed to Chinese intelligence. The record, as it stands, consists of a memo described secondhand, a company rebuttal, and an empty office in China.
What comes next
The reports will likely intensify congressional and regulatory attention to Nvidia's China-facing sales, particularly the New Matrix authorization. Expect pressure on the Commerce Department to explain how it vets end users — and on Nvidia to demonstrate that its export compliance extends beyond approved paperwork to verified recipients.
Original: nytimes.com
More from Olivia Hart
Show full bio
Staff writer covering people, launches and day-to-day practice in entrepreneurship, startups and venture funding at Business Bearings.
1,623 articles