Financial Advisers Ditch ROI, NAV and QCD for Plain English
Advisers are scrapping acronyms like ROI, NAV and QCD as jargon erodes client trust. Belmont's Cliff Robb and CFP Matt Coursen explain how plain English wins business.
By Amara Osei
3 min read
What's News
- Belmont University finance professor Cliff Robb says jargon won't help advisers build client trust
- Ann Arbor CFP Matt Coursen runs a 'self-audit' to remove acronyms like RMD and QCD from emails
- Coursen has 11 years in practice and asks colleagues to review drafts for clarity
- Robb flags basis points, volatility and equities as terms that confuse average clients
Financial advisers are dropping acronyms like ROI, NAV and QCD from client conversations because jargon is breaking trust, not building it. The shift comes as many Americans lack basic financial literacy and markets whipsaw on AI-driven tech stocks, making clear communication a competitive necessity rather than a courtesy.
The most credentialed advisers spend years mastering portfolio design, risk management, tax planning, investment vehicles and financial technology. By the time they take on clients, their heads are packed with technical vocabulary. The problem, experts say, is that clients often can't follow what they're saying.
"It's easy for advisers to get in a bubble and forget what others don't know," said Cliff Robb, a professor of finance at Belmont University's Jack C. Massey College of Business. "It's also a way for them to prove they belong in the space and prove they're knowledgeable. But that won't help them build trust."
How should advisers drop the jargon?
Robb tells financial planning students to practice explaining money outside the office. "I encourage my [financial planning] students to talk about money with friends in a way that's not intimidating," he said. "It's how to take technical deep dives into strategies and tell those stories in a neat, accessible way that's relatable."
A common tactic is asking clients directly: "What's your comfort level with this topic?" or "Do you understand what I mean when I say 'bond ladder' or 'reinvestment risk?'"
That approach can backfire. People rarely admit what they don't know. They nod, regret it, and the adviser races ahead in technical detail. Robb's fix: advisers should state upfront that they aim to speak plainly and invite clients to interrupt the moment something confuses them.
Admitting gaps helps too. "Advisers need to be straightforward and admit areas they're working to improve," Robb said. "Showing vulnerability and openness is better than [implying] 'I have all this training so listen to me.'"
What does a 'self-audit' look like in practice?
Matt Coursen, a certified financial planner in Ann Arbor, Mich., has spent 11 years learning to check in constantly rather than trust a client's nod.
"It's not taking a client's head nod as '100% I get it,'" he said. "So I ask questions to confirm their understanding."
Coursen runs what he calls a self-audit to strip out acronyms such as RMD (required minimum distribution) and QCD (qualified charitable distribution). He rereads every email before sending and cuts the jargon. He also recruits backup.
"I'll ask for feedback from my colleagues," he said. "I might have them read a draft of a long email I wrote or ask them after a meeting if I kept things simple and clear."
Nonverbal cues matter as much as words, experts note. Experienced advisers watch clients' reactions to gauge whether they're actually being understood.
Why is Social Security especially tricky?
Some terms carry more risk than others. Coursen handles Social Security carefully because many pre-retirees fear their benefits are at risk as the program faces an uncertain future.
When he mentions the Social Security trust fund, many clients assume it works like a private trust fund. He explains the difference: Social Security is managed by the federal government and funded by payroll taxes, while private trust funds are estate-planning tools where trustees manage assets for beneficiaries.
"Social Security is an incredibly complicated subject," he said.
Which 'basic' terms still confuse clients?
Even foundational vocabulary trips people up, Robb said. He points to "basis points," "volatility" and "equities" as terms advisers treat as everyday language but clients don't.
His translation rules are simple:
- Express rates in dollars instead of basis points
- Describe market swings instead of saying volatility
- Say stocks instead of equities
"For advisers, speaking with authority and confidence takes work," Robb said. advisers who make that effort — trading impressive-sounding shorthand for plain English — are the ones likeliest to keep clients engaged, and retained, through volatile markets.
Source: MarketWatch
More from Amara Osei
Show full bio
Senior reporter covering companies, deals and strategy in entrepreneurship, startups and venture funding at Business Bearings.
1,124 articles