Money & Markets

Impact investing hits $1.76tn, but 95% of assets still chase market-rate returns

The global impact investing market hit US$1.76tn, up 12% on 2024 — a sharp slowdown from 35% — and 95% of assets still target market-rate returns.

By Olivia Hart

3 min read

Impact Finance Bulletin: Finance-first impact investing still dominates the global market - Pioneers Post
Impact Finance Bulletin: Finance-first impact investing still dominates the global market - Pioneers Post3844328 / pixabay

What's News

  • Global impact assets total US$1.76tn, a 12% increase on 2024, per GIIN's latest biennial market sizing.
  • Growth slowed sharply from 35% between 2022 and 2024.
  • 95% of impact assets are invested targeting market-rate returns.
  • TERN launched the Refugee Venture Fund for UK startups founded by refugees; Anara Impact Capital's first fund targets MENA impact startups.
  • Reports on the UK and European impact markets are due in November; the AVPA conference runs 9-11 November in Cape Town.

The global impact investing market reached US$1.76 trillion this year, a 12% rise on 2024 — but 95% of those assets are still invested targeting market-rate returns, according to the Global Impact Investing Network's latest market sizing exercise. For a market whose critics demand it sacrifice something for impact, that single statistic says the debate remains unresolved at scale.

GIIN publishes its temperature check of the impact investing world every two years, and the headline number points to a sharp slowdown. Between 2022 and 2024, the market grew 35%. The latest 12% increase, by contrast, marks the weakest expansion the research has recorded.

What is behind the slowdown?

The GIIN data does not answer that question. As Pioneers Post notes, whether the deceleration reflects a maturing market, lower investor appetite, worsening challenges or "a bit of everything remains to be established." Readers should treat the growth figure as a fact and the explanations as speculation until further research lands.

Beyond the slower growth, the research suggests little has changed in how impact investors behave. Three patterns persist:

  • Impact assets under management continue to concentrate in the hands of a small number of larger players.
  • Investors continue to overwhelmingly target market-rate returns rather than accept concessions to pay for impact.
  • The global north continues to dominate — both in where impact investors are headquartered and where they allocate their money.

All three patterns have been flagged repeatedly as barriers preventing impact capital from reaching the social entrepreneurs who need it most, Pioneers Post reports. Despite growing calls for investors to "put impact first" — including the Social Enterprise World Forum's Social Investment Manifesto published last month — the step change needed for social entrepreneurs to access capital has not materialised.

GIIN's own leaders frame the challenge as a question: how do we translate scale into greater effectiveness? A $1.76 trillion market that behaves like conventional capital is large but arguably not distinct, and the sizing data alone cannot resolve that tension.

Can finance-first investing still create impact?

Two new venture capital funds reported this month argue it can. The Refugee Venture Fund, launched by TERN, invests solely in startups founded by refugees in the UK. Its stated aim is to close the funding gap for ambitious, high-growth refugee startups that are shunned by investors because of limited track records and negative misconceptions.

The second, Anara Impact Capital's first fund, backs early-stage impact startups in the Middle East and North Africa. Like the Refugee Venture Fund, Anara invests where others do not, and part of its thesis is that investing in impact startups does not mean accepting lower returns. Both funds share one objective: demonstrating that impact startups can be just as commercially competitive and financially attractive as regular businesses.

Anara principal Mohamed Hussain rejects the framing that one approach is superior. "I think we all have to agree that we just have different roles to play, and the ecosystem needs all of these different players," he told Pioneers Post. In his view, there is no right or wrong approach — different types of investors must play complementary roles, from venture philanthropy providing grants to social entrepreneurs, to finance-first investors enabling mature impact businesses to expand.

That argument cuts both ways. It defends finance-first funds from the charge of being less impactful, but it also leaves unanswered who, exactly, funds the early, riskiest ventures if not the largest pools of capital.

What comes next?

The market sizing season is not over. Two further reports are expected in November: one on the UK's social investment market and another on the European impact investing market, which should show whether the global slowdown is mirrored regionally.

In the UK, the Burnham government's first budget was unveiled this week, with Pioneers Post publishing analysis of what it means for impact investors. And the African Venture Philanthropy Alliance holds its annual conference in Cape Town, South Africa, on 9-11 November, under the theme "Beyond Aid: Financing Africa's Future for Sustainable Impact."

The November reports will test whether the 12% growth figure is a plateau or a pause.

Source: GN: Venture Capital

Share this article:

More from Olivia Hart

Olivia Hart

Show full bio

Staff writer covering people, launches and day-to-day practice in entrepreneurship, startups and venture funding at Business Bearings.

1,353 articles

Related articles

« Previous articleNext article »