No Franchise Law, No Disclosure Rules: India in 2027
India has no franchise-specific law, no disclosure statute and no registration regime; ICLG's 2027 guide shows everything rides on contract drafting and general statutes.
By Olivia Hart
4 min read

What's News
- India has no dedicated franchise, disclosure or registration law; general statutes such as the Indian Contract Act of 1872 govern.
- Multi-brand retail caps foreign ownership at 51% under the automatic route with a 30% domestic-sourcing requirement.
- Royalty withholding tax rose from 10% to 20% under the Finance Act of 2023.
- India ratified the New York Arbitration Convention in 1960; SIAC is the favourite for offshore disputes.
- The four Labour Codes took effect on 21 November 2025, consolidating 29 central labour laws.
India has no dedicated franchise law, no disclosure statute and no registration regime for franchise systems, according to the ICLG Franchise Laws and Regulations 2027 guide for India. Every protection a franchisor or franchisee enjoys comes from the contract itself, shaped by roughly a dozen general statutes.
The governing framework spans the Indian Contract Act of 1872, the Foreign Exchange Management Act of 1999 (FEMA), the Competition Act of 2002, the Trademarks Act of 1999, the Copyright Act of 1957, the Patents Act of 1970, the Design Act of 2000, the Income Tax Act of 1961, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996 and the Specific Relief Act of 1963. Parties must also account for GST and income tax obligations.
What must a franchisor disclose before a sale?
Nothing, by law. India imposes no mandatory pre-sale disclosure, no prescribed format, no update frequency and no continuing disclosure duty to existing franchisees. Sub-franchisee disclosure is governed entirely by the master franchise agreement. A false pre-contractual statement can still amount to misrepresentation or fraud under the Indian Contract Act of 1872, letting the aggrieved party void the deal and claim damages. The guide advises voluntary disclosure documents as the best evidence of good faith — a recommendation, not a requirement. There is no translation duty either; English agreements are routinely accepted, though some states may require local-language documents for ease of business.
Membership in the Franchising Association of India (FAI) is voluntary. Some associations require codes of conduct covering honest disclosure and arbitration referrals, but these bind only members.
How do foreign investors enter the market?
Non-residents invest through the Automatic Route, needing no approval, or the Government Route, requiring ministry clearance. Most retail and franchise sectors fall under the 100% automatic route; multi-brand retail is the exception, where 51% foreign ownership is permitted automatically subject to a mandatory 30% domestic-sourcing requirement. Franchisees typically operate as private limited companies or LLPs registered with the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, plus PAN, TAN and GST registrations. Food franchises need an FSSAI licence; importers need an IEC code. Foreign entities without an Indian presence cannot lease or acquire property without RBI permission.
What does competition law prohibit?
The Competition Act of 2002 treats franchise agreements as vertical arrangements under Section 3(4), covering exclusive distribution, territorial allocation, tie-ins and resale price maintenance. These are not per se unlawful; the CCI applies a rule-of-reason test, prohibiting restraints only where they cause an appreciable adverse effect on competition (AAEC), with the franchisor's market power decisive.
In FX Enterprise Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. v Hyundai Motor India Ltd, the CCI found Hyundai contravened resale price maintenance rules after it capped dealer discounts and used "mystery shoppers" to enforce compliance. Conversely, in Ghanshyam Dass Vij v Bajaj Corp Ltd, territorial limits imposed by a non-leading FMCG player were found unlikely to cause an AAEC. Post-term non-competes, normally void under Section 27 of the Contract Act, can be enforceable in franchise contexts because franchisors transfer trade secrets and goodwill. There is no statutory maximum term; agreements commonly run five to 10 years.
What about IP, tax and disputes?
Trademarks follow the Nice classification across 45 classes; a registered mark can be removed after five years of continuous non-use. There is no trade secrets statute — protection rests on contract and breach of confidence. Operations manuals and software gain automatic copyright as literary works.
RBI royalty caps were removed in December 2009; payments now flow through Authorised Dealer Category-I banks with withholding tax. The royalty withholding rate rose from 10% to 20% under the Finance Act of 2023, though treaty rates may apply. Relabelling royalties as management fees saves nothing, as fees for technical services face the same withholding.
India signed the New York Convention in 1958 and ratified it in 1960. SIAC dominates offshore arbitration; DIAC, MCIA and the ICA handle India-seated disputes. The four Labour Codes, in force since 21 November 2025 and consolidating 29 central laws, define joint-employer risk through a control test. E-signatures are valid under the IT Act of 2000, though powers of attorney and property documents still need wet ink. SEBI's BRSR requires the top 1,000 listed companies to report on value-chain partners accounting for 2% or more of purchases or sales, pulling franchisees into ESG reporting indirectly.
The so-what: in India, the franchise agreement is the entire regulatory regime — parties who draft thinly carry their own risk.
Original: iclg.com
More from Olivia Hart
Show full bio
Staff writer covering people, launches and day-to-day practice in entrepreneurship, startups and venture funding at Business Bearings.
1,378 articles