Money & Markets

J.P. Morgan: EchoStar Is a Cheap Backdoor Into SpaceX

J.P. Morgan says EchoStar's stock underprices its future SpaceX stake and its chances of striking further spectrum deals, calling it a stealthy play on Musk's space venture.

By Nathan Brooks

3 min read

Updated

EchoStar’s stock looks like a stealthy way to ride the SpaceX wave, J.P. Morgan says
EchoStar’s stock looks like a stealthy way to ride the SpaceX wave, J.P. Morgan saysStella_0813 / pixabay

What's News

  • J.P. Morgan says EchoStar stock is a 'stealthy way to ride the SpaceX wave'
  • The analyst argues investors underprice EchoStar's future SpaceX stake
  • J.P. Morgan also sees uncredited potential for additional EchoStar spectrum deals
  • The thesis treats EchoStar as a listed proxy for private SpaceX exposure

J.P. Morgan argues EchoStar's stock doesn't reflect the value of the SpaceX stake the company is set to hold — or its capacity to sign more spectrum deals. That's the core of the call, and it's a blunt one: investors are underpricing two assets that sit right on EchoStar's balance sheet pipeline.

The bank's analyst framing, as reported, is that the market "isn't giving EchoStar enough credit for the value of its future SpaceX stake or its potential to strike more spectrum deals." Read that sentence twice, because it contains the whole thesis. This isn't a story about EchoStar's operating business. It's a story about hidden, or at least under-recognized, asset value.

What does this change for investors?

For practitioners, the J.P. Morgan view reframes EchoStar from a struggling telecom operator into something closer to a holding company with two monetizable levers. The first lever is the SpaceX exposure — an indirect way to own a piece of the most valuable private space company in the market, without buying private shares. The second lever is spectrum. EchoStar sits on wireless spectrum, and the analyst case assumes more deals are possible after the transactions already struck.

The word "stealthy" in the bank's framing matters. The argument is that this exposure isn't obvious, isn't fully modeled, and isn't in the price. If that's right, the gap between market value and asset value is the trade.

Why the SpaceX stake drives the thesis

The centerpiece of the call is the future SpaceX stake. EchoStar is positioned to hold equity in Elon Musk's space venture, and J.P. Morgan believes the market hasn't marked that position at anything close to its worth. SpaceX remains private, which means most investors can't buy it directly through public markets. A listed company carrying a claim on that value trades at a discount the analyst considers unwarranted.

That discount is the opportunity the bank is pointing at. If EchoStar's SpaceX holding gets recognized — through further deals, monetization, or simply sharper analyst coverage — the stock becomes a re-rating story rather than an operational one.

The spectrum option investors may be missing

The second pillar is spectrum. The analyst argues EchoStar has "potential to strike more spectrum deals," which implies the company's airwave holdings carry value beyond what's already been transacted. Each additional deal would convert a passive asset into cash or equity, and the market, in J.P. Morgan's view, is assigning little to no probability to that upside.

What does this change for spectrum watchers? It puts EchoStar back on the list of companies whose balance sheets could move on a single announcement, rather than on quarterly subscriber numbers.

The bull case, and its burden of proof

Skeptics will note the thesis rests on two future events: the SpaceX stake materializing at attractive value, and additional spectrum transactions actually closing. Until either happens, EchoStar trades on perception. J.P. Morgan's contribution is arguing that perception is currently too pessimistic — that the stock is, in the bank's words, a "stealthy way to ride the SpaceX wave."

For investors who want SpaceX exposure but lack access to private markets, the analyst case makes EchoStar one of the few listed proxies available. The bet from here is straightforward: that the market starts paying for assets it can already see.

Source: MarketWatch

Share this article:

More from Nathan Brooks

Nathan Brooks

Show full bio

News editor covering regulation, policy and their impact on entrepreneurship, startups and venture funding at Business Bearings.

939 articles

Related articles

« Previous article