Money & Markets

XLK/XLB Call Puts Nov. 23 Target at 3.2951, Stop at 2.9004

A TradingView sector model run by thetediousbit sets a Nov. 23 XLK/XLB target of 3.2951 and a 2.9004 stop, favoring technology after a 12.7% ratio decline.

By Nathan Brooks

4 min read

XLK/XLB, 13 days: tech over materials. Graded Nov 23
XLK/XLB, 13 days: tech over materials. Graded Nov 23Firmbee / pixabay

What's News

  • Target: XLK/XLB closes at or above 3.2951 on Nov. 23 to win, 3.1% above the Nov. 10 start.
  • Invalidation: a daily close below 2.9004 before Nov. 23 ends the call early as a MISS.
  • Model: Information Technology led at +20 on Nov. 9; Materials ranked last at -20.
  • Risk sizing: the ratio's 60-session daily standard deviation was 2.06%, with a nine-session benchmark of about 6.2%.
  • Previous call: XLE/XLB ended early as a MISS on Nov. 2, with a stop 4% below its start.

By Nathan Brooks

TradingView author thetediousbit's XLK/XLB call requires the ratio to close at or above 3.2951 on Nov. 23, a 3.1% gain from its Nov. 10 starting point of 3.1964. The starting snapshot put XLK at 168.93 and XLB at 52.85.

thetediousbit wrote: "Call: the XLK/XLB ratio closes at or above 3.2951 on Nov 23." The author also set the final test: "Grading: on the Nov 23 close, at or above 3.2951 is a WIN, under it a MISS." The post tracks BATS:XLK/BATS:XLB.

What does the model see?

thetediousbit keeps a ledger that gives each of the 11 US sectors a two-week lean against IVW, an S&P 500 growth fund. The scale runs from -100 to +100.

At the Nov. 9 close, Information Technology ranked first at +20. Consumer Discretionary followed at +10, while Materials finished last at -20 and Industrials at -13.

The author turns that ranking into a 13-day technology-over-materials position. The window runs from Nov. 10 to Nov. 23.

How does size weighting change the signal?

thetediousbit says XLK and XLB are standard sector funds, but their baskets differ from the model's. The model's sectors cover 4,253 US-listed stocks, weighted by size, while the two funds contain S&P 500 members only.

Size weighting matters here, the author says. Counted one by one, 47 of the model's technology stocks lean ahead of IVW and 180 behind, so the sector's aggregate lead rests on its biggest names.

What does the setup require?

thetediousbit measured the ratio's daily moves over the previous 60 sessions and found a standard deviation of 2.06%. His sizing translates that volatility into a possible nine-session move of about 6.2%.

The win threshold sits at half that move above the start: 3.2951, or 3.1%. The stop sits one and a half times the move below: 2.9004, or 9.3%.

That makes the stop roughly three times as wide as the gain needed to win. thetediousbit ties the stop to the ratio's own swings rather than a fixed percentage carried over from the last trade.

His previous lean-based call, XLE/XLB for energy over materials, ended early as a MISS on Nov. 2, its first session in. That call's stop sat 4% below its start.

How does the call end?

The position runs for 13 days from Nov. 10 to Nov. 23, shorter than the usual two weeks. From Nov. 16, a new call opens each Monday, leaving two calls running at once.

thetediousbit's invalidation rule is explicit: "Invalidation: a daily close of the ratio under 2.9004 before Nov 23 ends it early as a MISS, graded that evening." A close at or above 3.2951 on Nov. 23 earns a WIN; a close below it earns a MISS.

The author plans a note on the idea every Wednesday and Friday from the last close, whether the result is good or bad. thetediousbit also closes with a disclaimer: "Quill is a character; not financial advice."

What does this change for sector investors?

The practical distinction is concentration. thetediousbit says the model spans 4,253 US-listed stocks, while XLK and XLB hold S&P 500 members only, so the fund pair does not reproduce the model's exposure.

Within technology, the split is also uneven. The author says 47 of the model's technology stocks lean ahead of IVW while 180 trail it, leaving the aggregate lead dependent on the largest names.

The immediate level for the trade is 2.9004. A close below it before Nov. 23 ends the idea early as a MISS; the Nov. 23 close at or above 3.2951 confirms the win.

thetediousbit frames the setup against the recent move. The ratio fell 12.7% in the 10 sessions into the start, descending from 3.6595 on Oct. 27.

For practitioners, the trade requires a 3.1% recovery from the start after a 12.7% slide. It stays alive unless a daily close falls 9.3% to 2.9004, and each close before Nov. 23 brings the next test.

Source: tradingview.com

Share this article:

More from Nathan Brooks

Nathan Brooks

Show full bio

News editor covering regulation, policy and their impact on entrepreneurship, startups and venture funding at Business Bearings.

2,085 articles

Related articles

« Previous articleNext article »